Posts

Why the Democrats will lose in 2020 and how they could stop that.

Fast-forward to November 4, 2020 at one in the morning, the Democratic Party has just lost a Presidential election, again. The usual pundits on CNN and MSNBC, Vox, Huffington Post, Young Turks, and the like, are crying and complaining. There are again threats of riot, visions of a forgotten future and little if any hope. The collusion elements of the past are no longer headlines, instead America is simply labeled as completely enveloped in racism and hate. But how did we get here, what went wrong screams the left. How could this be? How twice?!?! The answer is simple and it started in 2016. The Democratic Party could have had a simple and easy victory over the 45th President, instead of bequeathing him a second term. All they needed to do was simply focus on policy, and only policy, nothing else nothing more. By pushing their original Democratic platform of improved health care, environmental awareness, border control/reform, cybersecurity policy and infrastructural improvements, th...

You can't read a 440 page paper?

Americans, are we serious? You can't finish a 440 page report on your own President. Have you spent any time at all even glancing through a review of your Government? If you haven't read it, please refrain from voting in any election for you are ignorant in this space. Mueller Report

The World needs to take a position on Iran - America is the only Global Power.

I wonder the impacts of these actions on the poorest Nations/people in the world. The games played between a 2nd World Country and a 1st World ones. In the US, we hear something like this and I'd offer most don't pay attention at all - unless as part of some party rally cry to one end or another. And those that actually care aren't so impacted, what's the worst that can happen? But, to Countries not so established that rely substantially on oil for energy, and must rely on th ese shipping routes and hope/pray they are defended. What happens to those people, the vast majority of the world? So far the only true provocation towards the US has been shooting down a surveillance drone. No US flagged or ported ship has been touched. UAE, Indian, UK, Japan and others have, but not the US. Iran isn't made of stupid people, they know that if they openly attacked American vessels or Americans that wouldn't be good for their Country. They are playing a shrewd game. Other C...

Donald Trump will win in 2020 because America can't do better.

At some point Americans will realize that politicians race bait for a reason, in the end, they are all the same. They keep their job by having 'classes' and having those 'classes' attack each other. They always have. The hatred from Trump they espouse, isn't real. Their opinion of him, isn't real. They just want to keep their job. That is all. Why do they really hate Trump? Because he proved that someone not in their establishment could win. They hate that. It makes them mortal, and they don't want to hear that. They rely on voters not paying attention and simply following a party blindly. Whether you're a Dem or a Rep, that doesn't matter it is simply one promoted ideology over another. They don't really follow that ideology, they sell it to you "the People" (channeling inner Bane voice). And what is the worst part, Americans fall for it. They actually think they 'win'. They don't win. Nothing fundamentally changes course...

Open City, the 1973 program Clinton used to claim Trump was racist.

Image
Read a recent opinion article on CNN, which clearly I know was a mistake now, regarding "Why" Harriet Tubman wouldn't be put on the 20 dollar bill in Trumps era. The author immediately tries to link this to racism, even going as far as to claim a campaign remark by Clinton regarding a 1973 case against Trump Corp. The case is interesting. It comes on the heals of the Open City project that was an effort in the late 60-early 70s to 1)see if landlords discriminated against non-white 2) help place those discriminated in housing. A noble cause at first blush, something most people probably can get behind. The problem sits with two elements here though. If you do some research you'll find that the case wasn't against Trump, mores so a conglomerate of organization. The case was settled with no actual 'guilt'. Now, you could argue that paying off people equals guilt, I wouldn't but I can see why some would believe that. I dug a little deeper into Betty Hoeb...

Civilian Intelligence Service - There’s a wall for a reason.

One of the most under appreciated assets in the Defense of the United States is those who work in the Intelligence services, the ‘wheel of seals’. These Agencies include CIA, NSA, FBI, DHS, NRO, OTFI and a series of alphabet soup. There are over 13 formal Department of Defense Intelligence service capacities that allow the American Military to deploy effectively across the globe. The existence of these Agencies is the reason the average American goes through their day sipping coffee, going to work, playing with their kids, chatting on their phone, checking email, ‘enjoying’ social media and the Internet without any issue, deviations or neglect. Unaware that America is routinely under a 24 hour a day barrage of different attempted attacks, both from within and outside the Continental United States. These Agencies work mostly in secret, in spaces Americans don’t know and for the most part wouldn’t comprehend if faced with the shear capacity and intention of an adversary. The modern mi...

Socialist Empire of Maryland and...yet another dumb gun law.

The Justice Warrior Dems of the Maryland Assembly have yet again proposed another useless, pointless and purposeless emotional law that will do absolutely nothing regarding the blacks killing blacks..primarily in Baltimore. The new Law which of course Dems pushed requires long-guns (aka: shotguns, rifles) to go through the same Federal FBI checks for private sales and they would public ones. This sounds reasonable at first, unless you have one cell in your brain. If you do, you realize that the thug buying the AK off someone isn't looking to 'register' or 'buy it legally'. Yet another purposeless law, just imposes more issues on law abiding citizens. I will leave out the now countless examples of the System failing to realize people that shouldn't have guns, even with accurate checks in place. It is really so pathetic. Eventually average Americans will turn on their fucking brains. https://www.capitalgazette.com/news/government/bs-md-house-gun-bills-20190318-s...

Pew Pew Pew - Police shouldn't have guns.

Image
Oh look, judge jury and executioner caught on tape. How about instead of firing 15 rounds in the vehicle, which was apparently stolen without the use of a firearm or weapon until a passenger who gets out says he has a gun (which his never drawn or used), you simply call dispatch and say "plate number XYZ, heading ABC". Neh, makes more sense to literally let yourself be hit by a 5mph car so you can claim your life was threatened. Grr. Take the guns away. Love the line from the Police Union "this could have been avoided if the driver complied" or if your Officer didn't determine it was worth shooting 15 times at the driver.  I got my Pew Pew out and shot the big bad 5mph car. https://www.foxnews.com/us/arkansas-police-officer-fires-at-least-15-times-into-car-while-on-hood-in-deadly-shooting-caught-on-video

Michael "The Grim Reaper" Cohen set to testify?

These are always my favorite, people who are equal parts shit and liar telling you who the shits and liars are. Well, I guess maybe they know what it looks like because they are it - but I mean, how much can you trust that? Michael Cohen is going to say ‘Trump knew WikiLeaks would run an article’, sorry but who cares? You mean to tell me he knew that WikiLeaks would start telling the truth openly about the DNC? Remember, they didn’t make anything up, they just passed along emails openly sent by the DNC. Then in usual fashion, Mikey will call Donny racist with zero actual facts to that case other than nuance on words and ideology. Donny, the same man who won the Ellis Island Award is a racist? If that’s true he should be ‘fired’ for being a terrible one. Plus, I have to say calling a business man in the US a ‘con-man’ or ‘cheat’ is par for the course kids. They all are, how do you think they run Fortune 500 companies? Based only on their honor and intelligence? Who are you kidding? ...

Your taxes are going up - one of my favorite FakeNews spins of 2019.

Image
Your taxes are going up - one of my favorite FakeNews spins of 2019. Without a doubt you’ve heard rumblings if you pay any attention to tax code that you might pay more this year because Trump somehow screwed you. Well, as with much of everything you read or hear since 2001, that is a steaming pile of excrement wrapped around minimal facts. The facts of the case are this, the Federal Treasury has limited the amount of local and State income taxes you can deduct from your Federal taxes. As any taxpayer knows, the State and local municipalities routinely lay pipe on the taxpayer because they always knew, you’d never care. You didn’t care because any shade-tree accountant could deduct all those costs for you so when the Feds came to take their tribute, you thought you were being smart. Reality sets in. The local and State have been raping you like a drunk hooker for decades, you never cared. Now, all the local Legislatures have lathered up the Blitzkrieg to inform you that “TRUMP” some...

Brett Kavanaugh, poor Kavanaugh.

Honestly, I’m wondering what is the ratio of accusations to corroboration that enables you to call something a ‘fact’? Well, apparently if you’re a politician it is 2:1; if you have 2 accusers you have a corroborated story? What could go wrong. In light of Ford being a useless accuser who couldn’t corroborate a thing about her story - from not knowing how she got to the party, how she got home, but apparently vividly remembering 2 minutes in which her sole witness said ‘it didn’t happen’ - the political elite who would rather SCOTUS made laws than followed the Constitution, have brought forward another ‘accuser’. The similarity, her story. There is no corroborating evidence. There are no witnesses, no prior accounts, no discussions, just 20-40 year old story tellers. The insanity isn’t that these storytellers exist, it is that their stories are being taken as truths. Regardless of any facts. Let’s take this one step further, not only are stories becoming facts but nobody is focusin...

Protestors, just stop.

Much like the term "gay", "liberal" and "racist" the progressive left has watered down the concept of protesting. Protesting once had a substantial point and a measurable effectiveness. Today, protesting is the direct equivalent of children crying when they don't get something they want. It completely removes the effective measures it once maintained. Protesting every given thing with either mobs or hashtags is as purposeless as changing a Facebook profile to show solidarity with a travesty. Pointless. The leftist progressive has all but murdered people who object to their beliefs, then ironically accuses the other side of the argument for being 'racist' or ' bias' or whatever their narrative has socialized. It is nice to see a world finally fighting back.

Fascists at their finest.

There is absolutely nothing more fascist than banning speech, books or discussion. One of the tenants of Nazi propaganda was the banning of authors or discussions for the better good, the left has entirely embraced this. I suppose it is the norm, going back to the leftist-progressive roots that brought us Slavery - and the Civil War. http://reason.com/blog/2017/03/03/a-professor-who-attended-charles-murrays Hundreds of protesters—at least some of them students—crashed Murray's talk at Middlebury's campus, as I reported earlier . They talked over Murray and accused him of being a white nationalist. Murray is a controversial figure, but it would be wrong to describe him as a white nationalist. It would also be wrong to presume— as many faculty members did —that there's nothing to be gained from listening to him speak. And of course, it's wrong to disrupt his event and prevent him from speaking.

We need another Richard Pryor

This morning I watched a special on Richard Pryor, a comic I've always thought was hilarious but I never knew the back story behind his life and comedy. I am too young to have seen him in his prime, but from what I've heard and watched, he was amazing. What the world needs now is a modern Richard Pryor and to stop stifling people based on a definition of what the current American stream considers 'acceptable' discussion. Richard Pryor was one of the first mainstream personalities to use Nigger on a regular basis; whether in an album title or the lines themselves. Richard Pryor one time fired his entire staff, because they were white, to rehire a black staff because he felt it was closer to what he was. Richard Pryor would also recommend how many whites should be in his audiences - this racial and cultural attitude brought him a laundry list of hardships. NBC censoring him, Vegas shows cancelling him and long periods without any stage to play on. Bringing me back to ...

Modern Journalism has a lower bar than a Freshmans Term paper.

Have you noticed the uptick over the last 10 years in 'anonymous' sources? It was once a standard that you couldn't or at minimum shouldn't post something positioning itself as fact if you couldn't point to a source. In modern times of Cable media, sources seem irrelevant or simply attributes that are noteworthy if you have them. I think back to College and remember being told that in papers I couldn't write something as a fact without stating a source; fumbling around with the APA sourcing guidelines was mind numbing. Fast forward to today and it seems media outlets can randomly publish fact from 'anonymous' sources and people consume it as fact, politicians respond to 'truth' and Twitter explodes. Does anyone else believe this is crazy? Should we hold official media and speech to a higher standard? Shouldn't the press who claims protections of the first amendment but also wants to be considered factual to at least source their facts to so...

Crimes are not really crimes, they are money making schemes and social justice events - in some cases.

Most people understand what a 'crime' is and in most cases, though never defined, a crime generally has a victim - something that was wronged and therefore justice must be provided. For instance an assault has a clear victim, a robbery has a clear victim, fraud even has a clear victim. One thing that doesn't have a victim, government enforced social behavior. Want a clear example? Speeding tickets. A speeding ticket is a fine, or worse, issued by the State to a Citizen even though there was no victim involved more than paper and policy. Speeding could lead to a crime (manslaughter, injury, etc.) but it isn't a victim based crime in itself. In fact you could argue that "safety" is used for many instance of social justice crimes. It is for your safety that many States require a seatbelt in your car - or you can be fined. It is for your safety that States have cell phone laws for vehicles - or you can be fined. Keep in mind none of these had a direct victim; cert...

Stop blocking, deleting, protesting and start openly speaking

The US has degraded into a childlike argument where instead of discussing openly the views you may have, you yell, scream, break things or all out boycott or delete them. We don't discuss anymore, which was the cornerstone of what made this Country great, instead we threaten and we bully. Take the latest show of lack of adulthood with "PewDiePie", a person on YouTube who posted what was labeled a "anti-Semitic" joke. Instead of leaving the account alone and allowing dialogue, YouTube bowed to public pressure (aka lynch-mob tactics) and deleted the individuals account. This is also know as silencing them. This was just the latest example of progressive limitations of free speech. If you don't agree, you delete. That is the American motto now. If you find something offensive, you don't discuss calmly opposing opinions and bullet points, you respond entirely with emotion and fear. America today resembles a 3rd graders fight at a park. Lots of yelling and ...

Why BlackLivesMatter is basically a terrorist organization without the hardware or planning.

Image
From blacklivesmatter.com, tell me again how this isn't a false-propaganda organization focused entirely on giving arrogant clowns a finger to point: Black Lives Matter is an ideological and political intervention in a world where Black lives are systematically and intentionally targeted for demise.  It is an affirmation of Black folks’ contributions to this society, our humanity, and our resilience in the face of deadly oppression. Yeah, that comes directly from 'blacklivesmatter.com'. Sadly though almost 100% of their main focus is incorrect - proven by facts. Black lives are systematically and intentionally targeted. Wow, so this is completely false. In fact, a Harvard study by a black professor that set out initially with the theory that blacks were targeted by police, found that actually there was absolutely zero facts pointing to that conclusion. Of course, that didn't stop the rhetoric from spewing and the false racist narrative from b...

Stop holding black people down, please!

Is this a joke? Violence in Chicago (over 4,300 shot in 2016) and other cities at highs from black on black crime and police are shot at record numbers, but "Trump" might usher in a threat to blacks from policing? Are you completely brainwashed? The biggest threat to black people is people of any color that keep perpetuating this story line that someone, outside of the locality and individual,  is to blame. When we stop listening to that rhetoric, when we stop pointing a finger around saying "who is to blame for my outcome!" we will start to see a change. A white person is born without a boogieman to point to, and yet, there is still white crime, whites are killed by police more frequently and whites still drop out of schools, what they don't have, per society, is anyone but themselves to point to for their failure. We need to seriously address this problem, and continued progressive based emotional finger-pointing, isn't it. It starts with accountability an...

A new low in gun legislation

Image
NEW CALIFORNIA GUN LAW FOR 2017: People will no longer be able to buy semi-automatic rifles that have a bullet button allowing removal of the ammunition magazine, commonly used in mass shootings. Those that have such weapons will have to register them with the state. This is without a doubt the dumbest thing I've heard liberals say about guns this year, and it made it into a law. A "bullet button (est. 2007)", formerly known as a magazine release. Apparently California believes that if guns forced you to essentially unscrew the magazine from the gun with some type of tool, the insanely low levels of mass shooting would be even more irrelevant on society. This is the type of emotional, nonsensical, legislation that only hurts America. There is absolutely no benefit, this will not stop a single crime. They claim that this legislation was born from the San Bernardino TERRORIST attack. However, even in that case, the rifles were illegally modified. So yet again,...