Climate Confusion unfolds before our Eyes.
When I was growing up Climate Confusion was just ramping up in full swing. Schools were focusing on Global Warming and man's direct effect on the Ozone Layer, which was believed to cause the heating of the planet. Chemical companies were told to switch from aerosol based CFC cans because it was thought this ate away at the protective atmosphere of the Globe.
As time moved on terminology changed, Global Warming gave way to Climate Change. Climate change helped Environmentalists avoid having to deal with the constant questioning of "if the world is getting hotter, why is there more ice and less heat?" So called scientists that favored Climate Confusion made a point of highlighting needle-fine points instead of explaining entire stories.
Now we find that the United States has the coldest spring on record, Arkansas has snow in May and the United States has had less tornadoes in 2012-2013 on record that previously anticipated. So the question remains, if this so-called science was accurate, these things would be repeatable. That is the very definition of science, a repeatable event.
Climate confusion is just that, confusion. Humans, for all their amazing capabilities, know very little about how the environment truly works. Many theorize that climate confusion is the human explanation for cyclical environmental migration - meaning the environment has a cycle of cooling and heating that changes the atmosphere and environment. The thing is, there isn't any money to be made in cyclical natural events, there is however a fortune to be made in blaming any weather system event on humans. You can draft full policies, establish offices, fund lives on climate confusion. Just think of all the regulations and rules associated with "global warming" that are levied on corporations. That isn't to say we have a free for all of chemical dumping in the oceans and lands, but it is to say we approach problems smartly and ask questions. Humans are fallible, that much is true, and we need to always remember that. Remember that science told you the atom was the smallest thing, until it was split.
Humans are one of the most prevalent and aggressive species on the plant, we destroy but we equally create. We understand a vast amount of our impact, but that is a tiny particle in the matter of a global ecosystem (reminiscent of the Butterfly Effect Theory where by one minuscule action effects the world in multiple ways). Mankind could easily set out to destroy all its necessary natural resources, but that would only eliminate mankind, not the world. Even an all out nuclear war would leave living matter and particles behind, life. Man is far more fragile than the environment of Earth.
The climate is a living, breathing, entity made up of millions of complex organisms serving specific purposes. The day humans believe they can manipulate these highly developed ecosystems is the day we truly see the end of mankind.
As time moved on terminology changed, Global Warming gave way to Climate Change. Climate change helped Environmentalists avoid having to deal with the constant questioning of "if the world is getting hotter, why is there more ice and less heat?" So called scientists that favored Climate Confusion made a point of highlighting needle-fine points instead of explaining entire stories.
Now we find that the United States has the coldest spring on record, Arkansas has snow in May and the United States has had less tornadoes in 2012-2013 on record that previously anticipated. So the question remains, if this so-called science was accurate, these things would be repeatable. That is the very definition of science, a repeatable event.
Climate confusion is just that, confusion. Humans, for all their amazing capabilities, know very little about how the environment truly works. Many theorize that climate confusion is the human explanation for cyclical environmental migration - meaning the environment has a cycle of cooling and heating that changes the atmosphere and environment. The thing is, there isn't any money to be made in cyclical natural events, there is however a fortune to be made in blaming any weather system event on humans. You can draft full policies, establish offices, fund lives on climate confusion. Just think of all the regulations and rules associated with "global warming" that are levied on corporations. That isn't to say we have a free for all of chemical dumping in the oceans and lands, but it is to say we approach problems smartly and ask questions. Humans are fallible, that much is true, and we need to always remember that. Remember that science told you the atom was the smallest thing, until it was split.
Humans are one of the most prevalent and aggressive species on the plant, we destroy but we equally create. We understand a vast amount of our impact, but that is a tiny particle in the matter of a global ecosystem (reminiscent of the Butterfly Effect Theory where by one minuscule action effects the world in multiple ways). Mankind could easily set out to destroy all its necessary natural resources, but that would only eliminate mankind, not the world. Even an all out nuclear war would leave living matter and particles behind, life. Man is far more fragile than the environment of Earth.
The climate is a living, breathing, entity made up of millions of complex organisms serving specific purposes. The day humans believe they can manipulate these highly developed ecosystems is the day we truly see the end of mankind.
Comments
Post a Comment