Returning donation money, or impeeding the 1st Amendment?
Well this is slightly problematic, see because it isn't a proven assertion, it's a guess.
"Washington (CNN)The first black Republican woman elected to Congress is returning $1,000 in donations from Earl Holt, the alleged white supremacist whose writings have reportedly inspired Charleston shooter Dylann Roof."
I don't know, I have issues with peoples words being used as some level of justification for an action (in this case the psycho shooter). Just seems like you're opening Pandora's Box on declaring what parts of the 1st Amendment apply, and what don't
http://www.cnn.com/2015/06/22/politics/earl-holt-dylann-roof-2016-gop-donations/index.html
"Washington (CNN)The first black Republican woman elected to Congress is returning $1,000 in donations from Earl Holt, the alleged white supremacist whose writings have reportedly inspired Charleston shooter Dylann Roof."
I don't know, I have issues with peoples words being used as some level of justification for an action (in this case the psycho shooter). Just seems like you're opening Pandora's Box on declaring what parts of the 1st Amendment apply, and what don't
http://www.cnn.com/2015/06/22/politics/earl-holt-dylann-roof-2016-gop-donations/index.html
Comments
Post a Comment